The most over designed light switch? Or useful complexity?

There is a perennial debate about how much design is too much. We all want simpler things, except when we don’t.

Here’s an entertaining example. How complex can you make a light switch? And is there an amount of complexity that so complicated you can’t imagine a situation where the complexity would be useful to someone?

This photo by Steve Portigal shows one candidate for the most sophisticated switch design of all time.

BbEIEE9IgAImb5I

Challenge: What is this UI for?

Traveling to foriegn countries is always fun for designers. You get to see entirely different ways to solve familiar problems, or to see designs that try to solve problems you’re not sure are problems at all.

Here’s a great example. We found this design: Can you guess what it’s for?

(Photo by Jill Stutzman)japan-ui

Play games while waiting to cross street (Streetpong)

This student project from Germany raises as many design issues as it solves. It keeps you occupied while waiting for the light to change, and also indicates how much time is left. The project was for a course in interactive media.

The good: it likely prevents jaywalking. It’s a thoughtful use of design to fill dead time. It’s interactive.

The bad: the wait isn’t quite long enough to justify it.

Watch the video anyway. There’s some clever thinking here.

How to dial a (rotary) telephone

The irony of this instructional diagram is it would be needed today for anyone who had never seen one before.  The rotary UI reached is primacy in the late 1970s, before push button phones took over. For anyone born today, and never saw it used in a movie, would have a hard time figuring it out.

The problem of course is the diagram fails to explain the most important thing: how to actually dial a number.

The design itself had the curious side effect of making 0’s the most expensive number to dial, as it took the most work and the most time.

(Source: unknown)